Orissa High Court: Pursuant to Orissa’s Law Department decision of August 19, 1942, an advisory committee was established on that day, consisting of Shri J.E. Meher and Narasingh Rao as members and Sri Bira Kishor Ray as chairman. The study concluded that the construction of a separate High Court would complete the Province’s structure and result in a more efficient and pleasant administration of justice for all inhabitants.

The Building of the court:

At the beginning of the twentieth century, Assam, Bihar, and Orissa were all part of the Bengal Presidency. It was very difficult to manage administratively such vast territory occupied by people who spoke different languages and had other traditions. For administrative reasons, it was necessary to split such areas from the rest of Bengal that had never been divided previously. Partitioning the country in 1905, Lord Curzon aimed to inflame sectarian tensions among the Bengali nationalists by creating the new province of Bengal, which included the states of Assam and Eastern Bengal. The states of Bihar and Orissa were retained, but the rest of Bengal remained a province.

The Jurisdiction parts:

With a high Orissa high court case status, the new province of Eastern Bengal and Assam was meant to be a Muslim-majority nation, even though Lord Curzon was speaking to Muslims in Eastern Bengal and Assam. Citizens protested the separation of Bengal throughout India. It was a no-go for Bengalees from all walks of life. After years of struggle, they were forced to redivision the territory. The two sides of Bengal were reunited for the second time in their long history of conflict.

As a consequence of this, Bengal Presidency was divided into Bihar and Orissa. The two provinces of Bihar and Orissa were established on March 22, 1912. The Calcutta High Court retained jurisdiction over Bihar and Orissa even after their formation as new provinces.

To create the High Court of Patna in the city of Patna, King George V, acting under the authority granted by Section 113 of the Government of India Act, 1915, issued Letters Patent on February 9, 1916. The Patna High Court now has jurisdiction over the state of Orissa.

The High Court and Its Affairs:

Orissa was constituted a separate province on April 1, 1936, but it did not have its own High Court. In a resolution adopted on July 26, 1938, the Cuttack High Court Bar Association called for the creation of a separate Orissan High Court.

Proposals for a separate Orissa High Court were made in the Legislative Assembly on February 11, 1939, and a committee was set up to look into the idea. The vote was unanimous in favour of the resolution.

The Committee’s report was made available to the general public on December 27, 1943, in accordance with Resolution No. 29440-J. According to the findings of the investigation,

For the committee to complete its report, two concerns must be addressed that are not within the purview of the group. People in Orissa are focused on these topics. In British Orissa, a joint High Court for the province and the states of the subcontinent has long been envisioned. A constitutional problem may impede the committee’s progress, but the panel members think this is a matter outside the province’s purview and hence beyond their purview.

Despite this, the practical advantages of a combined High Court are so obvious that they must be mentioned in this context. It’s also worth noting that the monarch selected the first judges of the High Court. First, they propose that one judge come from each of three different backgrounds: the English Bar, India’s Indian Bar, and the Indian Civil Service. English bar members want the Chief Justice to be a member of their organization. For Orissa high court cause list, it works fine.

The Orissa high court Cuttack Committee has finished its job and accomplished its goal. The only thing left to do is reaffirm what they’ve already concluded. You may call them an organization.

According to the authors, to better serve the citizens of the Province, the formation of a separate High Court would be beneficial.

There must be no exorbitant expenditures in contrast to the revenue’s resources.

In other words, the committee’s estimate of the amount of work needed to fill a court of this kind is accurate “.

In 1947, certain princely states in Orissa and Chhatisgarh enacted the Eastern States Union Constitution Act, 1949, which established a High Court at Rayagarh, Central Province, with provisions for Circuit High Courts to be held in the capitals of some of these states. The Province of Orissa was re-established from the Feudatory States of Orissa on January 1, 1948. It is mentioned in the Orissa high court display board.


According to an eight-page judgement issued in May 2021, Odisha needed further decentralization of authority and active involvement by local communities and panchayats to guarantee that the main educational emphasis was provided.

According to the Supreme Court, funds for orissahighcourt must be utilized efficiently and inexpensively via approved administrative procedures and educational breakthroughs when local communities and panchayats are involved.

You Can Read Also:

A Detailed Guide About Rajasthan Court